Greek unwarranted “present” to Albania on its centennial celebration

By Ruben Avxhiu

 

A diplomatic mini-scandal of the Greek Foreign Minister canceling his participation in the festivities of the 100^th anniversary of Albania’s independence was so typical of the Balkans.

The official reason for the Greek cancellation was that the Prime Minister of Albania had described the Albanian lands as extending well beyond the borders of Albania, down to Preveza a port in northern Greece.

Dimitris Avramopoulos said that Sali Berisha’s comments “do not contribute to creating a climate of friendship, confidence and good neighborly relations.”

It mattered little that Berisha’s “sinful” words were taken out of context and in what seems to be a matter of failing to understand the difference between direct and indirect speech from the Greek side.

Berisha was not making any territorial claim but merely quoting the Albanian leaders who proclaimed the independence 100 years ago, in November 28^th 1912. In that time, they believed that the state of Albania would extend from Presevo (currently in South Serbia) to Preveza imagining that it would comprise the territories of the four villayets (large administrative units of the Ottoman Empire) in which Albanians were the dominant nationality. Within days, it turned to be a farfetched aspiration because of stronger neighboring countries combined with decisions of then Great European powers.

Berisha’s office took no offense at the Greek allegations and the cancellation of the official participation. “Friends shine in absentia,” was Berisha’s own comments when asked about the missing Greek high official in the ceremony. Meanwhile his office repeated that Albania has never and would never present territorial claims to its neighbors and that Berisha was talking about an historic context of 100 years ago.

The spokesman of the Greek Foreign Affairs responded to the office of Berisha that Albania should look 100 years forward to the future instead of 100 years behind. This reaction was particularly interesting, because it came from a country, which has filed an official protest against another neighbor, Macedonia, concerning Alexander the Great, a leader who lived nearly 2,500 years ago. Now, how is that looking towards the future?

As Albanians everywhere in the world celebrated the 100^th anniversary of our independence, looking back 100 years ago when it all began is natural. On that unforgettable day of November 28^th 1912, the historic flag of Skanderbeg was raised and almost 500 centuries of foreign yoke ended. What happened in the following days is also worth mentioning. Durrës, the main port of Albania was occupied by the Serbian military as landlocked Serbia was adamant to have some seashore on its newly expanded state, even though this was deep into central Albania.

Meanwhile Greece occupied the whole region of Ioannina, from the port of Preveza (mentioned by Berisha) to the important cities of Korca and Gjirokastra, within the current borders of Albania. They executed and imprisoned Albanian local leaders and painted local shops with the colors of the Greek flag.

On December 4^th 1912, as the government of the new state of Albania gathered in its first historic session in Vlora, Greek ships bombarded the town from the sea and occupied the small Isle of Sazan.

Only in 1920, at the League of Nations, efforts from Greece and Serbia to divide the Albanian lands between them, officially failed and Albania won its international recognition. A determining role played the United States of America that finally had entered the European political stage, by making sure that independence of small nations was respected and recognized. It is one of the main reasons why Albanians love this great wonderful country.

Nevertheless, almost half of the Albanian-speaking territories were given divided between the neighboring countries and Greece received a quite a chunk, a territory known to Albanians as Chameria. After the World War II, “just in case”, a shameful campaign of ethnic cleansing of most of the local ethnic Albanian population of Chameria. Entire families, women and children were dragged in the middle of the night. Most of their men killed or jailed. They were forced to walk for several days towards the border of Albania. A journey in which, many old people and children died.

More than 200,000 Chams live today in Albania, forbidden from returning to the birthplace of their parents. Greece refuses to recognize their property return or retribution claims, and has yet to apologize for this crime against humanity.

Albania is continually declared that it has no territorial claims towards Greece or any other neighboring country. Therefore, in this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to celebrate the 100th anniversary of its independence, Albania deserved respect instead of a lecture, especially from a neighbor that did all that it could to deny our country its very existence.

Nikolic’s irrational expectations in times of crisis

Serbian President, left, invited to a joint press conference with EU’s Barroso in Brussels.

By Ruben Avxhiu

In an interview to The Guardian, Serbian President, Tomislav Nikolic, said his greatest challenge was to fill the estimated $3bn hole in the budget. While he expects to solve this problem with the help of the international community he has warned creditors against making their help conditional on Serbia making concessions over Kosovo.

It is an interesting statement from the Serbian President. On one hand, his defiant pose is unnecessary as several Western officials, including some of the highest diplomats from the United States have made it clear publically that Serbian will not be asked to recognize Kosovo.

There are however expectations on efforts to resume the technical dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia, with the aim to normalize the life of citizens on both side of the border, despite their ethnic backgrounds.

On the other hand, no matter what your position on Kosovo is, you can’t deny the existence of a clear contradiction on the Serbian expectations in regard to this claim for international assistance. Serbia is spending billions of dollars to sponsor parallel institutions in Kosovo. Situated mostly in the north of the country these institutions defy the government and the law of Kosovo.

Serbia claims that these institutions offer vital assistance to the Serbian community in the North which are forced to live in enclaves since the time when the Kosovar authorities took over. Kosovo claims that it is these institutions which in fact isolate the ethnic Serbs in enclaves. Prishtina says that the isolation is in fact imposed on the local Serbs by these Belgrade-sponsored organs. It seems that hundreds of employees of the Serbian Internal Ministry are deployed in the area to organize local ethnic militia. Kosovo says that ethnic Serbs in the northern part of the country who have dared to cross the line and find a job with the Kosovar authorities have been threatened, harassed, assaulted and sometimes even killed. Serbia offers an opposing view. The local people have organized themselves in units to defend themselves from ethnically motivated attacks from ethnic-Albanian Kosovars who would like to see them move to Serbia.

No matter whom do you believe in these clashing reports, there are two points worth making here.

First, there can be only one set of laws and that the situation in northern Kosovo needs to be clarified. Lacking the required attention, energy and determination to resolve the situation, the international community seems resigned to accept it as frozen conflict. Nevertheless, temporary technical agreements are needed for the normalization of life in this part of the Balkans. This is why the process of talks between Prishtina and Belgrade should resume and continue despite the opposition in both countries.

Second, Serbia has the right to pursue its policies on Northern Kosovo, but it cannot ask the West to sponsor this political adventure. The hole in the Serbian budget is cause by the money it sends to northern Kosovo. Practically, Belgrade is asking the world to pay for it. That is why as I said above, one does not need to be a partisan of Kosovo’s territorial integrity to question the rationale of offering loans to Serbia.

The European Union has deployed in Kosovo its largest law and order mission in history, EULEX, which costs the European taxpayers more than $2 bn per year. EULEX structures are sabotaged by the presence of the parallel structures in northern Kosovo. Imagine the irony of asking the European countries for loans which will be used to sabotage another project funded also by them.

Therefore Nikolic should expect some Kosovo-related pressure if he asks for international economic assistance. Serious creditors expect their money to be used in order to revive the Serbian economy instead of being thrown to the bottomless pit of the Serbian adventure in Kosovo.

Nikolic’s focus on the supposedly victimized Serbia ignores the reality of today’s world financial market. Instead of pragmatic and intelligent analysis, he offers futile nationalist poses.

“Maybe someone thought we were ready to make various concessions if we were poor. But we expect the international community and our friends to help us to recover the economy in line with their duties and obligations,” Nikolic said to The Guardian.

However, the creditors’ caution in this respect has little to do with what they think about Kosovo and everything to do with their responsibility to those whose money they are using, whether it is taxpayers or investors.

“We don’t want be treated like country cousins,” he concludes.

Fair enough, but if you don’t want to be treated like “country cousins”, the first requirement is to not act like one.

 

(Published in Illyria newspaper, in New York, on July 30th 2012.)

Peter Lumaj and the issue of a dangerous precedent in the Albanian-American community

Brian K. Hill, left, gestures during a debate for the seat being vacated by U.S Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., in Norwich, Conn., Thursday, April 19, 2012. From left are Peter Lumaj, Hill, Linda McMahon and Christopher Shays. Photo: AP

By Ruben Avxhiu

 

(Published by Illyria newspaper – June 4, 2012)
Peter (Pjerin) Lumaj ran for US Senate in Connecticut for the seat left vacant by Joseph Lieberman, a well-known name to many Albanian-Americans.

One of the main leitmotifs of Illyria newspaper throughout its 21 years in business has been to discover and promote Albanian-American success stories and it is one of our most important contributions to the history of the Albanian nation.

In this context, nothing would make us happier than to have finally an Albanian in some high level position in Washington DC. After many wonderful achievements in business, science, sports and a variety of professions, we’d love to see our compatriots make it in the field of politics as well.

Unfortunately, it did not seem that Peter Lumaj was on the way to break that glass ceiling. He was running only on paper as he was not even close to compete with the two main contenders within the Republican Party in Connecticut.

Ours is a community with limited resources and we in Illyria were alarmed when Mr. Lumaj claimed to have raised more than $100,000 from Albanian-Americans who were understandably enthusiastic about the idea of the “first Albanian-American Senator”, but who knew little about his electability. Most of them were in Michigan and New York with little understanding of Connecticut political scene.

Not surprisingly many Connecticut Albanians seemed to oscillate between Chris Murphy on the Democratic side and Chris Shays on the Republican one. Murphy came first in his party convention and has a good chance of replacing Lieberman in the US Senate, while Shays managed only to get a place in the ballot with the party machine openly siding with his main competitor, Linda McMahon. Lumaj, who was endorsed by only 22 delegates out of 1245, claimed that the vote was a “sham”, but to those who have followed the race it was clear long before the elections that he did not really stand a chance.

Albanian-Americans are both entrepreneurs and active in US politics, supporting particularly candidates with strong credentials in foreign affairs and who understand the situation in the Southeastern Europe. Albanians are staunch believers in American values as well. Not surprisingly most of the candidates they support are the best ones for America as well. However, despite the Albanian generosity, our funds are limited and therefore, we must learn how to use them in intelligent ways. As a newspaper we think that it is our obligation to educate and inform our readers about politicians, their views, positions and electability. In our view, Mr. Lumaj was not truly in the race and he had no chance in front of McMahon and Shays. Understandably, Mr. Lumaj did not like our analysis, but any political analyst in Connecticut, worth his mantle, would have reached the same conclusions.

Mr. Lumaj was presenting himself from strict ideological conservative positions. Connecticut, in state level, votes either Democrats or moderate Republicans. Mr. Lumaj was offering a vision more appropriate for Kentucky than Connecticut. It was a ready-to-wear political identity acquired and modeled after the nation-wide Tea Parties of 2010, instead of a reflection of the experiences, expectations and exclusivities of the people of Connecticut.

Of course, we’d rather see a genuine candidate who believes in his positions rather than a flip-flopper who adapts to polls. Mr. Lumaj was right to stand by his views but at the same time there was very little chance that the people of Connecticut would look at him as an appropriate representative for them in DC. In a way, he was running in the wrong state.

I also pointed in my analysis that when you run as a newcomer in this level of politics, you need one of the following three advantages (if not a combination of two of them): financial means, local party support or a great name from a distinctive success in some other field of life. In Connecticut, Ned Lamont comes to mind, when he challenged a veteran like Lieberman for the same post, a few years back. Unfortunately, Lumaj lacked all three of them.

He threw $50,000 of his own money and raised a little less than $200K in six months. I pointed out the Gulliver effect. He was not only in the wrong state but he was in the wrong race as well. With that money, he was a dwarf in the US Senate race, but he could have been a giant had he been running for a local position instead. I advised him in my article to adjust his aim. (He seems to have been offended by my advice and decided to aim against Illyria instead.)

He was unknown to most Republican Party local officials and made little way with them in the months of his anemic campaigning. Not long ago, in 2010, another candidate close to the Albanian community, Joseph DioGuardi was also snubbed by the leaders of the Republican Party of New York in the state convention, but his grass root support and the endorsement of small town, local Republican leaders in the end defeated the party machine and he received his nomination in the primary. Mr. Lumaj had received only one endorsement from a local party leader and there was no visible movement in his support. He was aloof and lacked a proper campaign organization. I followed his campaign website, his twitter communications, his schedule and his mentioning in the media for about three months before writing my analysis. His campaign barely existed. Maybe he had never participated in an electoral campaign before, at least in that level and he had clearly failed to hire professionals who have a modicum of idea on how to run a campaign. Or maybe he lacked the sources to hire them. I doubt that he was in just for the attention of the Albanian community or as what I call an “electoral tourist”, who runs just out of curiosity.

Finally, his name was not known to the public of Connecticut. He presents himself as a “civil rights attorney” and I believe he focuses on immigration cases, which is fine, but he had never led any movement or action that could have particularly drawn the attention of the people of Connecticut. His campaign did little to solve this problem. He was rarely in the radar of the local media. While Shays and McMahon were mentioned at least 4-5 times daily by Connecticut media sources, one had to wait for about two weeks for the name of Lumaj to appear somewhere. Most of the time was in the background of news, which focused on the other two candidates. With some rare exceptions, Lumaj was almost never given a chance to introduce himself to the general voter. He did relatively well in the two public debates, but by then he had nothing to lose there and everything to gain so it was an expected success, which would matter little to the race.

In my article, I did not exclude necessarily the possibility of Lumaj being the best candidate. However, I focused first on electability and explained to our readers why without name recognition, money and party machine support, it is impossible to get elected.

Apparently, Mr. Lumaj took my analysis as a personal attack. He called the office, threatened to “expose” us and tried to reach people whom he believed could influence us. However, my article was meant first and foremost to analyze the race. Over the last decade I have written hundreds of similar articles as I have made it my mission to explain to the Albanian community how politics works in the United States and how they can and should get involved. It was natural that I would offer my opinion on Peter Lumaj’s candidacy and not only I do not regret writing about it, but I feel now remorse for not having written sooner and in a more blunt style which could have probably saved Albanian-Americans some of their hard-earned money which were shamelessly wasted in his practically inexistent campaign.

After the publication of the article I was in fact still hoping to be proved wrong. I would have rather had that if it meant having an Albanian-American US Senator. After all, in more than two decades of writing career, it is natural to miss the target at times and we all learn by making mistakes. Greater names in journalism and major sources of media have erred famously in the past: Dewey was declared winner of presidential elections by Chicago Tribune in 1948, CNN and other major televisions wrongly projected Gore as winner in the 2000 presidential elections, to mention a couple of cases. Unfortunately, my analysis was confirmed by the results of the Republican state convention in Connecticut; Mr. Lumaj received less than 2% of the vote.

One main problem that I had with his failed attempt was that he left the community nearly a quarter of a million dollars poorer. This money could have been used in other races where well-known supporters of our cause in Congress were facing tough battles. For example, Jeanne Schmidt, co-chairman of the Albanian Caucus in the US Congress lost her primary battle within the Republican Party in Ohio. A percentage of the money that was wasted for Mr. Lumaj’s campaign could have made the difference there. Similar battles are still waging across the country and our community should find ways to inform and organize themselves better.

I have heard that Mr. Lumaj claims that he opened the way now for other Albanians to try their luck in the high level of the American politics. I believe that the opposite is true. I think that he made it harder for other Albanians to run in similar races. He benefited by the trust of his unsuspecting compatriots by raising funds for an unwinnable battle, thus setting a dangerous precedent. We have seen this happen in other aspects of life as well. False prophets have always preceded the true ones in our Albanian world. This community has been milked before by pseudo-artists and pseudo-activists of various fields, only to make it harder for the real talents when they showed up to ask for help.

I have only respect for much more known and successful leaders of our community like Ken Biberaj who is running for the City Council in the Upper West Side of Manhattan, or Mark Gjonaj who is running for Assemblyman in The Bronx. They also could have tried to impress us by running for higher offices. I wish they had been endowed with the funds made available to Mr. Lumaj, but there is still time and hopefully, the community will wise up and throw its support behind the real candidates and its genuine representatives.

Mr. Lumaj seems to be now in a revenge mood, not against the Republicans of Connecticut who were not impressed by his campaign, or his rivals who never saw him as a threat, but against the only voice that tried to sober him up and help him put things in perspective. He did a disservice to this community and to his political future as well, by opting to ignore our advice and listen to the unprofessional people he seem to have surrounded himself during the months of this senseless electoral adventure.

In a recent article to examiner.com, a website he apparently has been using for years to sow the seeds of religious conflict among historically multi-religious Albanians, he throws against Illyria a bunch of misinformation which in his mind will damage our reputation. However, even here, he has done his homework with the same “talent” that he showed when doing research on Connecticut before running for Senator.

Nevertheless, the problem here is not the reputation of Illyria or its staff. We have nothing to prove to the Albanian-Americans. We are not asking for their vote or their money. Those who were not satisfied by our service have left for other means of information. Others have loyally been our readers, advertisers and supporters for more than two decades.

As for the claims in Mr. Lumaj’s article: I have never worked as a doorman (although at times, when I have to write this kind of explanations, I wish I had) or have tried to defraud the Voice of America (go figure!!) or have ever been sponsored by Mr. Sali Berisha the Prime Minister of Albania (another weird assumption of Mr. Lumaj). Illyria is probably the most unbiased nonpartisan newspaper in the entire Albanian world. It certainly does not accept money from governments and political parties. Furthermore, Leke Gojçaj is not and has never been publisher or part-owner of Illyria and this is easily verifiable. He is a respected leader of the community and a good friend of us and has explained this to Mr. Lumaj in person during the latter’s failed attempt to make us apologize for the article about him. (I never heard about apologizing for an analysis! However, we did suggest that Mr. Lumaj write a response with his view on his race and his chances of electability or that he become available for an interview to explain his take to our readers. Nevertheless, it would have hardly changed our opinion about his campaign at that point. My strong suspicion is that since the article was published in Albanian he may have missed the gist of the article has relied on others who described it poorly to him, but I may be wrong.)

To hundreds of thousands of Albanian immigrants who came to the United States throughout the last century no job was too insulting to take. From dishwashing to house cleaning, from heavy construction gigs to working in farms and factories, Albanians have made a name as hardworking individuals. Doorman sounds like a gentleman position to me compared to some other jobs Albanians have been employed. And although Mr. Lumaj may look down on it, I would have been proud to wear any of the uniforms which adorn hundreds of Albanians who are employed as doormen throughout New York and help to make this City a safe place to live. After all, it is people like them who have scrapped even their last penny to support candidates who over the years have understood the plea of the Albanian nation in the Balkans and have helped to steer the US foreign policy towards the principled positions it holds in that part of the globe. It is the hard-earned money of this kind of people that Mr. Lumaj cavalierly wasted with so much lack of understanding, of sensitivity and of responsibility.

A later, closer look, on Mr. Lumaj activity has made us believe that we were lucky after all that he could not make it in the Senate race. He has shown an increasingly disturbing behavior, which has nothing to do with his baseless allegations against Illyria. In 21 years of independent and principled reporting and opinionating, we have faced much heavier rants and accusations. It comes with the territory. However, the problems with Mr. Lumaj are of high concern to the entire Albanian community in US.

From badmouthing the Kosova Liberation Army as an “Islamic terrorist organization” (either by himself or via an assistant under the fake name Josif Mladic using the account josifmladic@aol.com, now documented by us) to portraying Albanian Muslims as radical extremists, from giving credence to the Serbian ludicrous claim that Ben Laden had been at some point in Kosova to accusing the Albanian government of being tied to the Iranian regime, despite the fact that Albania has been for years to be the most pro-American country in Europe.

It is hard for us to understand Mr. Lumaj’s agenda at this point. Why would someone asking for the vote and the money of Albanian-Americans subscribe to and promote such views on the Albanian nation, which is famous for its religious tolerance and harmony? I assume from his previous post in examiner.com that as a lawyer he represents clients who are asking for political asylum on religious persecution basis and this distorted image of Albania may help win the cases and advance his business. It is of course only an assumption. Albania is a European Union candidate and already a NATO member and is under the microscope of domestic and international human rights organizations, so these allegations seem quite hollow. The Serbs have tried hard in the past to convince Washington that KLA was an Islamic organization, but they failed because the truth prevailed. Do we have to return to this old debate just because some Albanian dusted off old lies for reasons that only he can explain? Furthermore, not only is Prime Minister Sali Berisha a staunch supporter of the United States but he is one of the few if not the only leader in office who has called Ahmadinejad “a neo-Nazi”. These are all published facts and we don’t need to be sponsored by Berisha, as Mr. Lumaj assumes, to point this out. Nor do we need to be paid in order to defend our Albanian nation from baseless allegations. Does Mr. Lumaj need to be paid to make them? One does not even need to be a patriot to defend the truth. A minimal decency is sufficient.

Maybe Mr. Lumaj believes that by rounding a number of accusations against us and by trying to damage our reputation, we would backtrack from exposing the truth about these matters. We shall not. It is our obligation as journalists with a responsibility for the image of our Albanian nation, as people of integrity with respect for the historic truths, and as citizens of this great country called the United States of America.

Jesus bought a gun in Craigslist and shot Mohammad (Islam)

OK that is the title that I chose for this news. Somebody missed a chance to look at the strange combinations of their names.

I am not implying anything that has to do with religion so spare me the idiotic comments.

MAN SHOT BY ‘CRAIGSLIST’ GUN TAKES AIM AT SITE

By JENNIFER FERMINO and PHILIP MESSING

Posted: 4:28 am
September 5, 2008

A Manhattan boutique owner is suing craigslist.com for $10 million, claiming he was shot with a gun purchased on the popular Web site.

Calvin Gibson, 50, who was shot six times by his schizophrenic neighbor in the East Village on July 24, believes the classified site is partially responsible.

“But for defendant’s negligence in failing to supervise and monitor the content of the ads placed on its Internet service, [the shooter] could never have legally obtained the handgun,” according to the lawsuit filed yesterday in Manhattan federal court.

The alleged gunman, Jesus Ortiz, who is being held without bail, “has a psychiatric history and a history of violent crime,” Gibson claims in the suit, and could never have qualified for a gun permit.

“New York has an extremely stringent gun law,” the suit says.

He claims Ortiz told the cops that he bought the gun on craigslist, and that the suspect’s mother told others the same story.

Gibson was shot after he stopped at a deli on East Seventh Street near Avenue D. A teen, Mohammed Islam, 18, was also wounded in the random attack.

NYPD officials could not confirm the suit’s claim. A craigslist spokesman could not be reached.

jennifer.fermino@nypost.com

http://www.nypost.com/seven/09052008/news/regionalnews/man_shot_by_craigslist_gun_takes_aim_at__127576.htm

Another Russian journalist arrested and shot dead without a trial

By ANDREW E. KRAMER

MOSCOW — A Russian journalist known for his opposition views was arrested at an airport in southern Russia on Sunday, then fatally shot in the head in what authorities said was an accident but human rights groups said was suspicious.

The shooting, in Ingushetia, and other recent violence in southern Russia suggested a possible further clampdown on domestic dissent, such as it is, in Russia’s volatile North Caucasus border region in the wake of the war in Georgia. The area has been under tight police control for years.

The Russian prosecutor general’s office said the journalist, Magomed Yevloyev, was shot in the temple while being driven from the airport to a police station, and said it would open an investigation into an accidental death.

“While police officers were attempting to transfer M. Yevloyev to an Interior Ministry office, an incident occurred,” said Vladimir Markin, a spokesman for the investigative committee of the prosecutor general’s office, according to the Interfax news agency. “M. Yevloyev received a gunshot wound to the temple area.”

The local police in Ingushetia, meanwhile, told the news agency that Mr. Yevloyev was arrested for taking part in a terrorist bombing, and that he had tried to grab an assault rifle from a police officer in the car.

While not nationally known, Mr. Yevloyev’s Web site was closely watched by rights groups and local residents as an independent source for news from Ingushetia, according to Oleg P. Orlov, a researcher with the human rights group Memorial.

“He was very popular in Ingushetia,” Mr. Orlov said in a telephone interview. When local Internet service providers blocked the site this year, residents downloaded the news on their cellphones, which could still connect to it, he said.

The Moscow office of Human Rights Watch issued a statement saying the death was “suspicious” and called for an investigation.

A number of Russian journalists have been killed in recent years. Anna Politkovskaya, who covered the war in Chechnya, was shot in the entryway to her Moscow apartment in October 2006. Two other reporters from her newspaper, Novaya Gazeta, died, one from an autoimmune disorder colleagues suspected was caused by poison.

It was unclear whether a recent jump in violence in Russia’s North Caucasus was related to the war in Georgia. Recently, Islamic Web sites have carried posts calling for a renewed struggle against Russia in the region, under the theory that the Russian Army was tied down in Georgia.

Over the weekend, a bomb was aimed at, but missed, an Ingush government minister; two policemen were killed in Kabardino-Balkaria; and a suicide car bomber struck a post of the Russian Interior Ministry in Chechnya, killing one soldier and wounding nine others and a civilian.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/01/world/europe/01ingushetia.html?ref=europe

Russia Is Brazen, Europe Weak

BERNARD-HENRI LÉVY

By BERNARD-HENRI LÉVY
August 27, 2008; Page A15

The Wall Street Journal

The future of Russia’s excursion in Georgia remains to be determined. But some conclusions can already be drawn:

- Russian power is extraordinarily brutal in the post-Soviet era, as we have already seen in Chechnya. This brutality has been confirmed — although on a smaller scale — in the spectacle of the Russian army occupying a sovereign country, moving through it as it pleases, advancing and retreating at will, and casually destroying the military and civilian infrastructures of a young democracy as an astonished world watches. Today it is Georgia. Tomorrow will it be Ukraine? Or, in the name of the same solidarity with the supposedly persecuted Russian-speaking populations, will it be the Baltic countries? Or Poland?

- The new Russia is indifferent to international protests, admonishments and warnings. The Cold War had its rules, its codes. It was a time when signs were carefully deciphered. There was a kind of half-warrior, half-pacifist hermeneutics in play, during which we spent our time reacting to what philosopher Michel Serres called “the signal fires and foghorns” of the adversary. In this new-look Cold War, there are no more signals. No more codes. Instead, Russia offers a permanently obscene gesture to “messages” we know will have absolutely no effect. Was it not at the same moment Condoleezza Rice was in Tbilisi that Vladimir Putin, with a cynicism and aplomb that would have been unthinkable in yesterday’s world, chose to advance his troops as far as Kaspi, only 30 kilometers from the capital?

- Russia has no shame when it comes to twisting principles and ideals. It brandishes the “precedent” of Kosovo — as if there could be anything in common between the case of a Serbian province hounded, battered and broken by ethnic purification which lasted for decades, and the situation of Ossetia, victim of a “genocide” that, according to the latest news (a report by Human Rights Watch) consists of 47 deaths. And look how they turn to their profit — as well as that of the same Russian-speaking minorities they want to bring back into the bosom of the Empire — the argument of the “duty to intervene” that might justify the exactions, in Gori and elsewhere, of the Russian army and its militias. This is a fine, grand principle dear to the French foreign minister and a few others. How daring! Well, Mr. Putin dared, Mr. Putin thought about it and did it.

- European — and in this instance French — diplomacy is weak. We expect a great democracy to condemn and sanction the aggressor, without nuance. But in effect the opposite was done. The party that was attacked was the one sanctioned. The weak, not the strong, was made to yield. Just as 15 years ago in Dayton, Bosnian leader Alija Izetbegovic was forced to sign, with a heavy heart, the agreement laying out the dismemberment of his country. Mikheil Saakhashvili, the Georgian president, was also forced to ratify a document that the Russians speak of as the “Medvedev document.” Not a word in it mentions the territorial integrity of the country.

Then there are the famous “additional security clauses” acknowledging the Russian army’s right to be stationed there and to patrol, as scandalous in principle as they are vague in their modalities of application. Has the world turned upside down? This must be a dream.

- Western public opinion fell with disconcerting facility for the thesis advanced — from the very first day — by the Kremlin’s propaganda machine. We know now that the Russian army had been hard at work on its war preparations since before Aug. 8. We know that it massed at the “border” between Georgia and Ossetia a considerable military and paramilitary logistical presence. We know the Russians had methodically repaired the railroad tracks that the troop-transport trains were to take, and we know that at least 150 tanks went through the Roky tunnel separating the two Ossetias the morning of Aug. 8. In other words, no one can ignore the fact that President Saakhashvili only decided to act when he no longer had a choice, and war had already come. In spite of this accumulation of facts that should have been blindingly obvious to all scrupulous, good-faith observers, many in the media rushed as one man toward the thesis of the Georgians as instigators, as irresponsible provocateurs of the war.

We must re-examine all of this. We must analyze in greater depth the mechanisms of a blindness that may, if we are not careful, perpetuate the Western “decline in courage” denounced in his time by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, but which we thought belonged to the past. Reason, if not honor, demands that we go to the rescue of Europe in Tbilisi.

Mr. Lévy’s new book, “Left in Dark Times: A Stand Against The New Barbarism,” will be published next month by Random House. This piece was translated from the French by Sara Sugihara.